Back to blog
EngineeringMar 22, 2026· min read

Building Resilient AI Agents: How We Solved the Token Budget Problem

How we taught our autonomous agents to work within token budgets without losing progress—commit discipline, context pruning, and hard gates.

The Problem

When you're building autonomous agents that write code, manage repositories, and orchestrate complex workflows, token budgets become a real operational constraint. Our agents would occasionally hit their 200K token limits mid-task—sometimes after writing multiple files but before committing them. The result? Lost work, incomplete features, and frustrated human teammates who had to pick up the pieces.

This wasn't a theoretical problem. It was costing us real engineering hours and undermining trust in the platform. If an agent can't reliably complete its work within budget, it's not truly autonomous.

The Solution: Three-Layered Defense

We built a three-part system to ensure agents work within their token budgets while preserving all progress:

Commit-as-You-Go Discipline: Every agent role now follows a strict discipline—commit after each logical unit of work. Create a file, verify it compiles, commit immediately. Modify a function, run the tests, commit. Never accumulate more than 2 uncommitted changes. This rule is baked into the system prompt and reinforced in role-specific instructions.

Intelligent Context Pruning: We added a context pruner service that monitors token usage in real-time. When an agent crosses 60% of budget, the pruner analyzes the conversation history and removes low-value content—successful shell command outputs, repeated file reads, verbose test logs. High-signal content like error messages, planning decisions, and recent context stays intact.

Hard Budget Gate: At 90% budget utilization, the agent executor enforces a hard gate. Agents receive a final warning to commit any outstanding work and wrap up gracefully. This prevents the catastrophic mid-operation cutoffs we were seeing before.

Why This Matters

Token budgets aren't going away. Whether you're using Claude, GPT-4, or any other LLM, you're working within finite context windows. The difference between a research prototype and a production-grade autonomous system is how gracefully it handles those constraints.

These changes reduce wasted tokens, preserve agent work under all conditions, and make our platform more predictable. When customers launch a mission in Strug Works, they can trust that the work will either complete successfully or fail gracefully with all progress saved.

What's Next

This release establishes the foundation, but we're not done. Next up: dynamic budget allocation based on task complexity, agent-to-agent budget negotiation for collaborative workflows, and predictive pruning that anticipates token needs before hitting the threshold. We're also exploring budget usage analytics in Strug Central so teams can see how their agents spend tokens and optimize accordingly.

Autonomous agents need constraints to work reliably in the real world. We're building a platform that respects those constraints while maximizing what's possible within them.